FX Daily: The Yen Defence Gets a Washington Backstop
Japan’s latest intervention was more than another attempt to frighten speculators away from the yen. The estimated $52.8 billion operation on July 31 would be the largest single-day currency intervention in the country’s history, pushing the yen to its strongest level since May and signalling that Tokyo is prepared to impose a much higher cost on anyone treating USD/JPY as a one-way trade.
What gives the operation greater credibility is the emerging policy understanding between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda. It is not a formal currency accord, but the division of labour is becoming clearer. Washington is prepared to support efforts against disorderly yen weakness, while the BOJ keeps further tightening on the table without explicitly turning exchange-rate management into monetary policy.
My read is that this is the real change. Japan has already spent at least $255 billion supporting the yen since September 2022, and previous interventions eventually failed because they leaned against the yield differential without altering it. This time, Tokyo is not standing alone. US involvement increases the political cost of attacking the yen and reduces the risk that intervention becomes another temporary ambush followed by a fresh march higher in USD/JPY.
The consequences extend well beyond Japan. The yen remains one of the world’s dominant funding currencies, allowing investors to borrow cheaply and buy higher-yielding currencies, equities and other risk assets. That trade works beautifully while the yen stays weak and volatility remains contained. It becomes far more dangerous when the funding currency begins rising sharply.
A sustained yen rally could force investors to sell those higher-yielding positions and repurchase yen, turning an orderly adjustment into a self-reinforcing unwind. So far, the latest intervention has disturbed the carry trade rather than destroyed it. But it has broken the assumption that every yen rally should automatically be sold.
The unresolved issue remains the BOJ. Washington can reinforce the defence, and Tokyo can punish excessive speculation, but neither can permanently erase the interest-rate gap. Unless Ueda follows the political signal with firmer policy, or US yields move materially lower, the market will eventually return to test the authorities.
From a trader’s perspective, that test now carries much greater risk. The next push higher in USD/JPY will no longer be aimed only at Japan’s Ministry of Finance. It will be testing a broader US–Japan policy front, the stability of the carry trade and the credibility of the BOJ at the same time.
AI Daily: China Resets the Price of Intelligence
China’s AI price war is moving faster than the market’s ability to reprice the consequences.
DeepSeek’s newly released V4-Flash reportedly costs about three cents to run through a standard benchmark battery, according to Artificial Analysis data cited by Reuters. That makes it more than 100 times cheaper than Anthropic’s top model, although the comparison comes with an important caveat: V4-Flash still trails the leading US systems on complex reasoning and difficult multi-step agentic work.
That creates a potentially uncomfortable equation for the AI investment boom. If token prices continue falling while model efficiency improves, usage can rise sharply without producing the revenue growth needed to justify every data centre, memory order and power commitment currently being built into the market.
This does not mean the hardware trade ends tomorrow. Cheaper inference may stimulate demand and broaden adoption. But it does weaken the assumption that exploding AI usage will automatically translate into equally explosive pricing power.
The next real test is DeepSeek’s heavier V4-Pro model. If it approaches frontier performance while preserving China’s pricing advantage, the market will have to decide whether the AI boom is becoming larger through volume or less profitable through commoditisation.
Korea Daily: Retail Walks Away From the Kospi
South Korea’s July rout did more than wipe out leveraged positions. It broke the spell that had pulled a new generation of retail traders into the KOSPI.
The index lost 22% in July, its worst month since the global financial crisis, and even an 18% rebound on Friday failed to restore confidence. Retail investors sold a record amount into that recovery, while social media filled with traders saying they would never invest in Korean stocks again.
My read is that this is no longer simply a volatility story. It is a trust story.
Retail investors poured roughly 78 trillion won into Kospi shares during May and June, encouraged by the AI boom, government reform promises and the launch of single-stock leveraged ETFs. Many arrived late, borrowed heavily and concentrated their exposure in Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, which together make up more than half of the index.
When the market turned, the damage was brutal. Trading was halted four times during July, leveraged ETFs amplified the swings, and investors who had been promised a modernized equity culture instead felt they had been invited into a casino.
The AI investment case has not disappeared. Samsung and SK Hynix remain enormous long-term winners, and Korea is still one of the world’s most important semiconductor markets. But fundamentals are not the immediate issue. Confidence is.
From a trader’s perspective, the market can recover faster than the people who were burned by it. Until retail investors stop treating every rebound as an exit opportunity, the Kospi will struggle to rebuild the domestic bid that helped drive the mania in the first place.
July may eventually be remembered as a correction in the AI cycle. For many Korean traders, however, it already feels like the end of an era.
Is now the time to buy 000660?
ProPicks AI evaluates 000660 every month against thousands of alternatives using 100+ financial metrics.
It found Siemens Energy (+231.5%) and Sandisk (+189%) before the crowd did. Could 000660 be next—or is there a better opportunity in the same space?
Don't wait to find out.